🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the bill for further review if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar discussions in other member states